Why Not Try Trickle-up Economics?

Republicans revel in President Ronald Reagan’s supply-side theories that critics call “trickle-down” economics.  They believe tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy lead to investments in plants and equipment, which theoretically result in economic growth that trickles-down to create jobs for working Americans.  But huge tax cuts in 1981, 2001 and 2003 helped create mounting federal budget deficits.

In fact, the fiscal year 2009 deficit that resulted from the Great Recession and tax cuts by President George W. Bush was horrendous.  So in 2010 President Barack Obama appointed a fiscal responsibility and reform commission named for its co-chairs, Alan Simpson, a Republican, and Erskine Bowles, a Democrat.

The Simpson-Bowles Commission designed a tax reform plan that repealed the Alternative Minimum Tax, eliminated deductions, lowered rates and taxed capital gains and dividends like ordinary income.  Individuals would be subject to three brackets, 28 percent, 22 percent and 12 percent; corporations would be subject to a 28 percent income tax rate.

These lower tax rates might look like a Republican dream.  But unlike every GOP tax plan since Reagan, the S-B plan would significantly raise revenues.  The commission co-chairs reasoned that deficits could only be reduced by a combination of revenue increases and spending cuts; so they proposed significant spending cuts too, including common sense reforms of so called entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

A simpler, fairer tax code that increases revenues would be a good first step in trickle-up economics.  The next step would be implementing the S-B recommendations for eliminating duplicate government programs, providing more resources for reducing fraud in government programs and making government more efficient.

Increased revenues and reduced spending will lower the federal deficits; but that’s only one goal of trickle-up.  Americans must be able to earn a wage that lifts them out of poverty and makes them tax payers instead of welfare recipients.  The current minimum wage of $7.25 per hour subsidizes the profits of Walmart, McDonalds and other low wage employers while burdening U.S. taxpayers with the cost of providing food stamps and Medicaid to their underpaid employees.

So the minimum wage should be raised appropriately and indexed to inflation.  It doesn’t have to be one size fits all; a wage scale could be established that covers teenaged workers and other employees with special circumstances where a lower wage might be appropriate.

Greater federal revenues and controlled government spending would also mean that more robust investments could be made in infrastructure, research and other programs that improve the economy.  Infrastructure projects were advocated by candidates from both parties during the 2016 election cycle. These projects just make sense.  Spending on bridges, roads, etc. creates good paying construction jobs and spending by these workers generates even more jobs.  Contrary to Republican dogma, government spending — which is around 20 percent of Gross National Product (GDP) — does create jobs.

Now let’s talk about trickle-up.  Consumer spending is around 70 percent of GDP.  The economy expands when consumers are doing well and spending.  New car sales improve, construction of new homes surges, Walmart revenues increase and people eat at McDonald’s more often.  Strong corporate revenues and profits cause stock prices to increase, which benefits the wealthy.  Just consider what happened during President Bill Clinton’s administration.

Clinton engineered a significant tax increase in 1993 and he worked with congressional Republicans to reduce government spending.  The result was a booming economy, a soaring stock market and a federal budget that had surpluses from 1998 through 2001.  Clinton left office with unemployment at historic lows and the highest job creation record, on record, easily beating tax cutting icon Ronald Reagan.  But then the Bush administration took over.

After inheriting a balanced budget in 2001Bush cut taxes twice and started wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.  His tax cuts reduced federal revenues by an estimated $1.5 trillion over 10 years.  The two wars sacrificed over 6,000 American lives and they cost taxpayers an estimated $3 trillion.  Economic growth wasn’t strong under Bush and there was very little trickle-down.  So he ended his eight years in office with the devastating Great Recession, huge federal deficits and the worst job creation record, on record.

Unfortunately Republicans never seem to learn.  This year they again want a massive tax cut and increased military spending.  They have talked about a $1 trillion infrastructure program but recent reports indicate that it is more talk than a plan; and it will take a back seat to tax reform.  Well, we’ve tried cutting taxes for the wealthy.  These cuts left the middleclass hoping that the economic benefits would trickle-down to them; but they didn’t.

So let’s start on a significant, government-funded infrastructure program; the nation needs it.  Then enact a simpler, fairer tax code that increases revenues; we need that too.  And raise the minimum wage to put more money in the hands of consumers; they’ll spend it.  What if Wall Street bankers have to pay a little more to the IRS?  Let them hope that the economic growth from consumer spending trickles-up through the stock market to offset their added tax burden; it just might happen.

To me, trickle-up economics makes just as much sense trickle-down.

 

Footnote:  I thought it would be a welcome change to write a blog without mentioning the name of — well, you know who.

About eeldav

I am a retired corporate attorney who has lived in both Europe and Asia. While working my responsibilities took me to over 40 countries in Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Why Not Try Trickle-up Economics?

  1. Ken Walker says:

    I entirely agree. It remains a mystery to me how intelligent, even cunning, members of the ruling elite never catch on to the fact that our economy would grow very rapidly if ordinary people had more money to spend. Wages, salaries and incomes have been stagnant for decades. Kids leave college so burdened with debt they cannot buy cars, homes or start families. Meanwhile our Republican friends continue to raise the price of health care for most all of us and this further depresses participation in the broader economy. Even Tim Geitner, the former Treasury Secretary, said during the Great Recession “All that is needed for a recovery to begin is for people to start spending again.” Of course, Tim failed to mention his friends in Wall Street and the Banking Industry had just wiped out the life savings of millions, tossed more millions out of their homes and jobs and allowed banks to begin a system where virtually nobody could get a mortgage or car loan. Of course, Tim’s friends never went to jail for any of the mayhem they caused. Oh, did I mention Tim is now back working inside the same financial system that almost killed the American economy?

    It also remains a mystery to me how many voters still think the Republicans are going to do anything to help them improve their lives. Nonsense. My rookie Congressman Jack Bergman has done nothing in his first 5-6 months in office except vote for any bill or resolution which further squeezes the people who put him in office. He voted for both of the despicable health care bills and has not deviated from the party line at any time. How his constituents cannot be aware of how hard he is working against their interests is beyond me.

    One shudders to think what he and the Republican leadership will try to pass when it comes to Tax Reform, Social Security Reform, budget spending, deficit control, etc. He has no idea that you can’t reach economic stability on budget cuts alone. We MUST increase taxes–mostly on those with incomes above $150-180 K per year. Lowering of corporate taxes should come with an agreement that corporations will repatriate some of the billions they have languishing in overseas
    accounts.

    God help us all…..

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s